SEGMENTATION CHARACTERISTICS AND ACTIVITY OF CIXIAN-DAMING FAULT
-
摘要: 根据邯郸市活断层探测的最新资料,结合野外调查和石油地质的研究成果,对磁县-大名断层的分段性进行了研究;根据探槽开挖及测年结果的分析,对其活动性进行了讨论。研究结果显示,磁县-大名断层从东向西可分为3段:大名-临漳段、磁县-峰峰段和南山村-岔口段,3段呈左阶展布。研究表明:磁县-峰峰段晚更新世以来没有活动的证据;西段活动性较强;大名-临漳段沿线有多次中强震发生,其活动性有待进一步研究。由于上覆沉积层的影响,磁县-峰峰段未见明显的地表破裂带,因沉积物厚度逐渐减薄而表现为上断点由东向西逐渐变浅,在南山村-岔口段表现为明显的地表破裂带。Abstract: Based on analysis of the latest data obtained from the project of active fault surveying in Handan city, combined with field investigation and the explanation of seismic profile from oilfield, the segmentation of Cixian-Daming fault is studied.According to analysis of digging trench and testing sample's age, we discuss the activity of Cixian-Daming fault.It is shown that Cixian-Daming fault is divided into 3 segments, which are Daming-Linzhang segment, Cixian-Fengfeng segment and Nanshancun-Chakou segment.It can be deduced that the activity of middle segment of Cixian-Daming fault is steady since late Pleistocene based on the result of sample's ages, while the activity of west segment is active based on topography investigation and the latest study, which was surface fracture belt formed by the earthquake occurred in 1830.According to geological data of oilfield, the depth of Daming-Linzhang segment is buried deeply to 1200m.Even so, its activity should be studied because of a few earthquakes occurred along the fault.Surface fracture belt cannot be found along Cixian-Fengfeng segment for thick upper sediment.The depth of each upper breakpoint gradually turns shallow because of the thickness of the upper sediment turning thin.Therefore surface fracture belt can be easily found along Nanshancun-Chakou segment.
-
Key words:
- Cixian-Daming fault fault /
- segmentation /
- activity /
- surface fracture belt /
- Cixian earthquake
-
[1] 郑炳华, 虢顺民, 徐杰, 等.燕山地区大地构造基本轮廓[A].见:中国科学院地质研究所、国家地震局地质研究所编.华北断块区的形成与发展[C].北京:科学出版社, 1980, 170-178. [2] 徐杰, 宋长青, 楚全芝.张家口-蓬莱断裂带地震构造特征的初步探讨[J].地震地质, 1998, 20(2):146-154. [3] 王挺梅.北京地区近代构造与地震活动的初步研究[J].地震地质, 1979, 1(2):38-45. [4] 高战武, 徐杰, 宋长青, 等.张家口-蓬莱断裂带的分段特征[J].地震地质, 2001, 19(1):35-42. [5] 冉勇康, 邓起东, 杨晓平.1679年三河-平谷8级地震发震断层的古地震及重复间隔[J].地震地质, 1997, 19(3):193-202. [6] 江娃利, 刘仲温, 李咸业, 等.1830年河北磁县强震区活动构造初步研究[J].华北地震科学, 1994, 12(1):21-27. [7] 江娃利, 张英礼.河北磁县北西西向南山村-岔口活动断裂带活动特征与1830年磁县地震[J].地震地质, 1996, 18(4):349-357. [8] 张四昌, 赵军, 刁桂苓.华北地区震源断层与深浅构造关系的初步研究[J].华北地震科学, 1995, 13(2):1-10. [9] 徐杰, 牛娈芳, 王春华.唐山-河间-磁县新生地震构造带[J].地震地质, 1996, 18(3):193-198. [10] 陈国星, 田勤俭, 任利生.1830年磁县7(1/2)级地震发震构造及强震复发间隔研究[J].地震, 1997, 17(增刊):19-26. [11] 周建生, 杨长春.渤海湾地区前第三系构造样式分布特征研究[J].地球物理学进展, 2007, 22(5):1416-1426. [12] 国家地震局震害防御司.中国历史强震目录(公元前23世纪至公元1911年, M ≥ 4.7)[M].北京:地震出版社,1995. [13] 刁桂苓, 张四昌, 赵军, 等, 1999.用现今小地震研究历史强震的震源断层-以1830年河北磁县7(1/2)级地震[J].地震地质, 21(2):121-126. [14] 韩竹军, 冉勇康, 徐锡伟.隐伏活断层未来地表破裂带宽度与位错量初步研究[J], 地震地质, 2002, 24(4):484-494. [15] Ikeda M, Zhao D P, Ohno Y.C rust al structure, fault segmentation, and activity of the Median Tectonic Line in Shikoku, Japan[J].Tectonophysics, 2006, 412(1-2):49-60. [16] Harkins N W, Anastasio D J, Pazzaglia F J.Tectonic geomorphology of the Red Rock fault, in sights in to segmentation and land scape evolution of a developing range front normal fault[J].Journal of Structural Geology, 2005, 27(11):1925-1939. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1452
- HTML全文浏览量: 275
- PDF下载量: 128
下载:
