山长仑, 张玲, 李永红, 张坤. 对数字地震记录用速度与位移测定近震震级的讨论[J]. 华北地震科学, 2001, 19(4): 65-72.
引用本文: 山长仑, 张玲, 李永红, 张坤. 对数字地震记录用速度与位移测定近震震级的讨论[J]. 华北地震科学, 2001, 19(4): 65-72.
SHAN Chang-lun, ZHANG Ling, LI Yong-hong, ZHANG Kun. DISCUSSION ABOUT DETERMINING LOCAL EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE WITH DISPLACEMENT AND VELOCITY OBTAINED FROM DIGITAL RECORDS[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences, 2001, 19(4): 65-72.
Citation: SHAN Chang-lun, ZHANG Ling, LI Yong-hong, ZHANG Kun. DISCUSSION ABOUT DETERMINING LOCAL EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE WITH DISPLACEMENT AND VELOCITY OBTAINED FROM DIGITAL RECORDS[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences, 2001, 19(4): 65-72.

对数字地震记录用速度与位移测定近震震级的讨论

DISCUSSION ABOUT DETERMINING LOCAL EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE WITH DISPLACEMENT AND VELOCITY OBTAINED FROM DIGITAL RECORDS

  • 摘要: 通过对近震速度震级公式的理论分析与实测结果的检验表明,用最大地动速度与相应周期乘积的1/2π倍,即TVmax/2π来代替最大地动位移测定近震震级是不合适的,其所定震级普遍比模拟位移震级偏小,而且两种震级之间也没有一种较简单的关系。用地动速度与相应周期乘积最大值的1/2π倍,即(TV/2π)max代替最大地动位移测定近震震级是正确的,但实际操作不便。对速度型数字地震记录通过积分恢复地面位移后所测震级与模拟位移震级相对比,实测结果表明,两种震级一致性较好。

     

    Abstract: the theoretical analysis to local earthquake velocity magnitude formula and observational test shows that it is improper to substitute the maximum ground motion displacement with TVmax2π(Vmax is maximum ground motion velocity;T is period) in determination of local earthquake magnitude.The magnitude determined with this method is generally smaller than the magnitude determined with analog displacement,and there is no simple relationship between the two magnitudes.The result to determine magnitude with (TV/2π)max instead of the maximum ground displacement is correct,but it is not convenient in practice.Through integral to change velocity digital records into surface displacement,the magnitude we got is consistent with the magnitude from analog displacement.

     

/

返回文章
返回